Added: Taiwan Drye - Date: 08.03.2022 03:30 - Views: 46580 - Clicks: 1620
Here are seven crucial areas in which these polar-opposite films differ:. Friends With Benefits stars Justin Timberlakea popular sex symbol with minimal acting experience, while No Strings Attached stars Ashton Kutchera popular sex symbol with minimal acting talent. In No Strings Attached, Kutcher is burdened by a self-centered, overly sexual, hippie-ish father, played by Kevin Kline. In Friends With Benefits, Kunis is burdened by a self-centered, overly sexual, hippie-ish mother, played by Patricia Clarkson. The tone of No Strings Attached is that of a standard rom-com, punctuated with soft-R raunch.
Friends With Benefits boasts an aura of transgressiveness … before devolving into a standard rom-com, punctuated with soft-R raunch. No Strings Attached relies primarily on situational humor, supplemented with clever dialogue; Friends With Benefits relies primarily on clever dialogue, supplemented with situational humor. There you have it.
You can suss the differences yourself this weekend, when Friends With Benefits opens in theaters nationwide. - to use the wp menu builder - to use the wp menu builder.
Where Are They Now? Want More? Follow hollywood. Male Lead Friends With Benefits stars Justin Timberlakea popular sex symbol with minimal acting experience, while No Strings Attached stars Ashton Kutchera popular sex symbol with minimal acting talent.
Comedic Style No Strings Attached relies primarily on situational humor, supplemented with clever dialogue; Friends With Benefits relies primarily on clever dialogue, supplemented with situational humor. Aug 5,
Friends or fwb no strings attachedemail: [email protected] - phone:(294) 602-4603 x 2681
War of the Sex Friends